Let’s get this out of the way first when doing an SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X comparison.
I am not currently an affiliate of Ranker X. So that might make you think that, in a comparison of SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X I’m going to downplay the software.
Also this is not a full review, just a quick comparison. The full SEO Autopilot review is here
I’ve used it on several occasions and in fact one of my out workers uses it as her daily SEO link building driver. I know the interface well and have seen the results Ranker X campaigns often.
So, what do I think of it?
In short. It’s good. Very good. First let’s take a look at these SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X features.
Ranker X Feature List
- Posting links to high authority sites
- Posting to social media
- Solid link indexing options
- Cross platform (Mac / Linux and Windows)
- Excellent 3rd party Api integration for captcha solving, content creation and spinning
- Relatively easy to use wizard type interface for most operations
- True SAAS (software as a service) set up. Browser rather than OS driven
- Solid user tutorials to get you started
- Decent success rates
All good. So far in the comparison of SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X there is not much to choose between them. The true browser driven experience of Ranker X is both a benefit, and a major concern.
From the developer’s point of view, it is a great idea. The user’s browser has a moderate amount of coding downloaded into it, but the main software is carried out via the Ranker X servers themselves and accessed via a web browser. This has benefits and disadvantages.
The big advantage of Ranker X vs SEO Autopilot that you don’t need a specific OS and you don’t need to have a modern machine on or have a VPS cost overhead. But you do need a very stable internet connection (more of that below).
Sounds brilliant, and some of the time, it is. But when it isn’t. It’s frustrating.
I’ll hand over to my VA Su to complete this section of the SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X discussion
A Regular Users Point of View
Hi,
I’m Su, Paul’s VA. I create links for him and his clients and have used Ranker X for about 13 months.
Where I live the machines, we use are not powerful, they are mostly a few years old but we have very good internet connections provided for us by the government. Even with these super-fast internet speeds and low latency and PING, I often have to re-start Ranker X campaign set ups when a connection is lost. This kind of drives me mad.
Most of the time the campaign is still there once the connection returns, but maybe 1 in 3 times, it’s gone and that means starting again. That can be half a day’s work lost, even of you use the save button, sometimes it doesn’t work.
Ranker X looks very professional and I use other SAAS services and the difference seems to be the save regularity and the effectiveness and recoverability of the save state. I love Ranker X and find it the easiest to use overall, but the reliability aspect is a major concern for me.
I should also like a lot more customization for the WEB2.0 profiles and accounts I create. There is no way to name them or place biographies on them I think the survivability of accounts on these platforms would improve a lot if these issues were fixed.
SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X Summary
Price wise SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X is a very close proposition. Functionally both are very similar. Ranker X looks a little more professional. It has an excellent UX and UI that looks like it was designed by an expert in the field.
Once you understand the campaign set up it is smooth in operation, if, as Su says, sometimes prone to losing your work.
The set of authority sites, specifically coded SEO Autopilot Vs Ranker X offer about the same value.
In terms of developer support they are both first class. Even as a none affiliate and currently not selling Ranker X, I would make it a strong second consideration. But I prefer the speed and desktop control of SEO Autopilot. I get that Ranker X offers the developers license security as the /”grunt work” is done on their servers, but that seems to offer a slightly below par performance and risk to the user. But for all that there isn’t much between these great link building offerings.